Follow-up from "#40 - Denial of service via AsciiDoc include:: overuse"
The following discussion from !143 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@qzhaogitlab started a discussion: (+2 comments) Hi @alexkalderimis It seems this MR is merged. I happen to see this test case description is the duplicate as the case below. Should this one be
'allows the Nth include'
instead ofNth + 1
?