Skip to content

Release post - GitLab 13.9

Andrew Thomas requested to merge release-13-9 into master

Process Improvements? Have suggestions for improving the release post process as we go? Capture them in the Retrospective issue.

Release post:

Related files:

Release post branch ownership:

  • The Release Post Manager is solely in charge of changes to the release post branch. To avoid potential merge conflicts later during content assembly, it is imperative that TWs and Message leads do not merge updates from master to the release post branch even if it is falling behind. The Release Post Manager will take care of merging updates from master as part of the content assembly process on the 18th.

Handbook references:

People:

Release post manager Tech writer Messaging Social
@awthomas @rdickenson @brianglanz DRI: @wspillane & @social for Slack Checklist item

Release post kickoff (@awthomas)

Due date: 2021-02-07 (By the 7th)

Before starting on this checklist, you should have created the release post branch and required files as explained in the Handbook

  • Verify this MR is labeled ~"blog post" release release post priority1 and assigned to you (the Release Post Manager)

  • Add the current milestone to this MR

  • Create a release post retrospective issue by using the Release post retrospective template, and use Release Post X.Y Retrospective as a title. Once created, update the link at the top of this MR description. Example retro issue.

  • Replace each @mention in this MR description with the names of the Release Post Manager, Tech Writer, Messaging Lead, and Social Lead for this release

  • Update the links in this MR description

  • Update all due dates in this MR description

  • Make sure the release post branch has all initial files: sites/marketing/source/releases/posts/YYYY-MM-DD-gitlab-X-Y-released.html.md, data/release_posts/X_Y/mvp.yml and data/release_posts/X_Y/cta.yml

  • Add the release number and your name as the author to sites/marketing/source/releases/posts/YYYY-MM-22-gitlab-X-Y-release.html.md

  • Per guidance on communication for the release, create the X-Y-release-post-prep channel in Slack, and invite @rdickenson and @brianglanz and the release post manager shadow (whomever is signed up to run the next release post). As a topic, add the release post MR, the link to the review app, and the link of the retro issue:

    MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/1234
Review App: https://release-X-Y.about.gitlab-review.app/releases/YYYY/MM/DD/gitlab-X-Y-released/
Retro issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/issues/1234

  • Update the topic in the #release-post channel:

    MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/-/merge_requests/1234
Preview page: https://about.gitlab.com/releases/gitlab-com/
Review App: https://release-X-Y.about.gitlab-review.app/releases/YYYY/MM/DD/gitlab-X-Y-released/

  • Set up a 15 minute weekly standup with the TW lead and Messaging lead to touch base and troubleshoot. If times zones conflict, this is not mandatory. Sample agenda

  • In the #release-post Slack channel, remind Product Managers that all content blocks (features, recurring, bugs, etc.) should be drafted, and under review by the 10th. All direction items and notable community contributions should be included in the release post.

  • Confirm your local dev environment is running a current version of Ruby. See Handbook section Local dev environment setup to run content assembly script.

  • Remind TW and Messaging lead (either via slack or weekly standup) not to merge in changes from master to the release post branch. See the section Release post branch ownership above for more details.

Release post item creation reminders (@awthomas)

Due date: 2021-02-10 (By the 10th)

  • Remind the product managers in the #release-post channel that today is the day to have Release Post Items created and in review by the PMM and TW counterparts
  • Create the [bugs and performance improvement MRs]((https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/release-posts/#create-mrs-for-bugs-and-performance-improvements)
    • Inform EMs the bugs and performance improvement MRs are ready to receive their contributions by mentioning @gitlab-com/backend-managers and @gitlab-org/frontend/frontend-managers in the comments of this MR, asking them to add their notable team performance improvements and bugs fixes to the MRs you've created by providing them with the direct links
    • Copy the link from the above comment in this MR to @gitlab-com/backend-managers and @gitlab-org/frontend/frontend-managers and share it in Slack #development and Slack #eng-managers as well
  • In Slack #release-post, share link to just the Bug Fixes MR and ask PMs to work with their EM to add high impact bugs to the MR

Recurring items starting on the 12th: @awthomas

General Content Review As PMs finalize their release post items it can be helpful for the RPM to review and offer feedback. This reduces backpressure on the 17th as items are merged and provides additional review from someone with a fresh perspective. You can start this as early as the 12th, but this should be an ongoing task leading up to content assembly on the 18th. Review each MR labeled Ready for content that follows handbook guidance. See What RPM should look for when reviewing content blocks.

To easily manage and track reviewed items do the following:

  • Bookmark a filtered MR list similar to this to track release post items you haven't reviewed. (note: add the correct milestone to that filter)
  • Add the rp manager reviewed label to any RP item you've reviewed.

Reminding and Alerting DRIs It's important to keep DRIs up to date regularly with items they need to deliver for the release post. Especially given how async and distributed GitLab team members are early reminders are very helpful.

  • Alert DRIs (PMs, EMs and others as needed) at least one working day before each due date (post a comment to #release-post Slack channel)

General contributions @awthomas

The release post is authored following a changelog style system. Each item should be in an individual YAML file.

Contribution instructions

See Handbook: Contributing to the release post.

Content blocks

Due date: 2021-02-10 (10th)

Product Managers are responsible for raising MRs for their content blocks and ensuring they are reviewed by necessary contributors by the due date. Content blocks should also be added for any epics or notable community contributions that were delivered.

Product Managers are also responsible for making sure all required (Tech Writing) and recommended (PM Director and PMM) reviews get done for their content blocks. To help reviewers prioritize what to review, PMs should communicate which content blocks are most important for review by applying the proper labels to the release post item MR prior to assigning the MR to reviewers. (ex: Tech Writing, Direction, Deliverable, etc). PMs can also follow these guidelines to help decide which content blocks should get PM Director and PMM reviews.

To enable Engineering Managers to merge the content blocks as soon as an issue has closed, PMs should ensure all scheduled items have MRs created for them and have the Ready label applied when content contribution and reviews are completed.

Product Managers should only check their box below when all their content blocks (features, deprecations, etc.) are complete (documentation links, images, etc.). Please don't check the box if there are still things missing.

Reminder: be sure to reference your Direction items and Release features. All items which appear in our Upcoming Releases page should be included in the relevant release post. For more guidance about what to include in the release post please reference the Product Handbook.

  • Manage
    • Access (@mushakov)
    • Compliance (@mattgonzales)
    • Import (@hdelalic)
    • Optimize (@ljlane)
  • Create
    • Source Code (@danielgruesso)
    • Code Review (@phikai)
    • Editor (@ericschurter)
    • Gitaly (@mjwood)
    • Ecosystem (@deuley)
  • Plan
    • Project Management (@gweaver)
    • Product Planning (@cdybenko)
    • Certify (@mjwood)
  • Verify
    • Continuous Integration (@thaoyeager)
    • Pipeline Authoring (@dhershkovitch)
    • Runner (@DarrenEastman)
    • Testing (@jheimbuck_gl)
  • Package
    • Package (@trizzi)
  • Release
    • Release (@ogolowinski)
  • Configure
    • Configure (@nagyv-gitlab)
  • Monitor
    • Monitor (@sarahwaldner)
  • Secure
    • Static Analysis (@tmccaslin)
    • Dynamic Analysis (@derekferguson)
    • Composition Analysis (@NicoleSchwartz)
    • Fuzz Testing (@stkerr)
    • Threat Insights (@matt_wilson)
  • Protect
    • Container Security (@sam.white)
  • Growth
    • Activation (@jstava)
    • Conversion (@s_awezec)
    • Expansion (@timhey)
    • Adoption (@mkarampalas)
    • Product Intelligence (@kokeefe)
  • Fulfillment
    • Purchase (@amandarueda)
    • Provision (@amandarueda)
  • Enablement
    • Distribution (@joshlambert)
    • Geo (@fzimmer)
    • Memory (@fzimmer)
    • Global Search (@JohnMcGuire)
    • Database (@fzimmer)
    • Infrastructure (@awthomas)

Recurring content blocks

Due date: 2021-02-10 (10th)

The following sections are always present and managed by the PM or Eng lead owning the related area.

  • Add GitLab Runner improvements: @DarrenEastman
  • Add Omnibus improvements: @joshlambert
  • Add Mattermost update to the Omnibus improvements section: @joshlambert

Due date: 2021-02-10 (10th)

Final Merge

Due date: 2021-02-17 (17th)

Engineering managers listed in the MRs are responsible for merging as soon as the implementing issue(s) are officially part of the release. All release post items must be merged on or before the 17th of the month. Earlier merges are preferred whenever possible. If a feature is not ready and won't be included in the release, the EM should push the release post item to the next milestone.

To assist managers in determining whether a release contains a feature. The following procedure documented here is encouraged to be followed. In the coming releases, Product Management and Development will prioritize automating this process both so it's less error prone and to make the notes more accurate to release cut.

Content assembly and initial review (@awthomas)

Note: Final Content Assembly, Structural Check and Messaging Lead Review steps all happen in sequence on the 18th starting ~8am PST (America/Los_Angeles). If the Release Post Manager, TW Lead, and Messaging Lead span many timezones it's recommended you coordinate ahead of the 18th to understand how this could impact working hours for each team member. If need be, the time of initiated the final content assembly and the subsequent coordinated tasks can be shifted, as long as Final content review with the CEO and EVP Product begin no later ~12pm PST, to allow enough time for feedback/updates.

Due date: 2021-02-12 (12th)

  • Per the instructions in the handbook request MVP nominations with a link to an issue for collaboration. Be sure to follow the instructions in the handbook page to maximize contributions to the MVP issue.

Due date: 2021-02-15 (15th)

  • Remind PMs/EMs to contribute to the bugs and performance improvement MRs by commenting on the Slack threads you initiated in #release-post, #development and #eng-managers on on 10th
  • Select a cover image for the release post
  • Verify that the selected cover image has not been used before.
    • Tip: MacOS users, navigate to the source/images/ directory and use the search bar in the Finder to search for cover. Make sure the scope is set to only search "images". This won't reveal all previous images, but the last couple years have had pretty consistent naming.
  • On the release-13-9 branch, add the cover image to source/images/13_9/13_9-cover-image.jpg. Tip: Be sure to use an _ between release numbers, not a -
  • On the release-13-9 branch, in sites/marketing/source/releases/posts/2021-02-22-gitlab-13-9-released.html.md, add details about the source image.
  • Choose an MVP for this release based on what's surfaced in the MVP issue
    • If no MVP nominations have been added to the MVP issue by the 15th, send reminders in Slack with the link to the MVP issue. An easy way to do this is to respond to your original Slack solicitation posts and resend to the whole channel.
    • Once one or more quality nominations have been received, choose one and notify via Slack #release-post of your choice. Use this chance to solicit any last-minute nominations and confirm that the contribution your pick was nominated for will make it into this release.
  • A day before the TW review date / merge of the Bugs and Performance Improvements MRs remind @gitlab-com/backend-managers and @gitlab-org/frontend/frontend-managers about the content deadline by revisiting and commenting on the Slack threads in #development and #eng-managers by referencing links to the specific MRs

Due date: 2021-02-17 (17th)

  • Mention the Distribution PM reminding them to add any relevant upgrade warning by doing an upgrade MR
  • Ask the Messaging Lead to finalize the introduction by the 18th
  • Check with the Messaging Lead to see if they need help pinning down the final themes/features for the intro
  • If there are no deprecation MRs, ask in the #release-post Slack channel if there are any deprecations to be included
  • Finalize your MVP selection and work with the nominator of the MVP to write the MVP section in data/release_posts/X_Y/mvp.yml on the release-X-Y branch
  • Make sure the PM for the MVP feature adds a corresponding content block if applicable, linking from the MVP section
  • On the release-X-Y branch, add the MVP's name and other profile info to data/mvps.yml

Due date: 2021-02-18 (18th at 8 AM PT and NO earlier)

  • Lock the unreleased directory to prevent more release posts from merging there.

    • Post in Slack release-post and eng-managers channels that the folder is now locked till the final merge is complete on the 22nd, reminding that all work must shift to the release post branch.

  • Perform final content assembly by pulling all content block MRs merged to master into the release post branch by using the following commands locally (one command at a time):

    git checkout master
git pull
git checkout release-x-y
git pull
git merge master
bin/release-post-assemble
git push origin release-x-y

  • Do a visual check of the release-X-Y content block and image folders to make sure paths and names are correct

  • Make sure the release post branch View App generates as expected

  • Do a visual check of the blog post and ordering of content blocks for secondary items to confirm they are grouped by stage in descending alphabetical order.

  • Notify the PM team in #release-post Slack channel, including a link to the View App, that final content assembly has happened and all work must now shift from master onto the release post branch via coordination with the release post manager. In the same Slack post, remind PMs they need to check the View app to make sure all their content is showing up as expected with correct image/video links, etc. Note: If the release post assembly script fails, look at the bottom of this section of the release post handbook page for further instruction

Due date: 2021-02-18 (18th)

  • Remind PMs to review their content blocks for accuracy in the View app and check off their content and recurring blocks by tagging them into this MR
  • Label this MR: ~"blog post" release review-in-progress
  • Check if there are no broken links in the View App (use a dead link checker, e.g., Check my Links)
    • Links to confidential issues may be missed. It is helpful to check for broken links as an unauthenticated GitLab user (either logged out, in another browser, or in Incognito mode).
    • If there are links to external blogs that are still broken in the View app, check with PMs, Messaging leads and others as needed to make sure the referenced blogs go live before the 22nd
  • Check all comments in the MR thread (make sure no contribution was left behind)
  • Make sure all discussions in the thread are resolved
  • Assign the MR to the next reviewer (messaging lead)

Other reviews

Ideally, complete the reviews by the 19th of the month, so that the 2 days before the release can be left for fixes and small improvements.

Marketing content and positioning (Messaging Lead)

The Marketing content, positioning, and reviews are done by the Messaging lead: @brianglanz

Use the process listed in the release post handbook page. The checklist below outlines what to do and when to do it, while the handbook goes into more detail on how to perform each task.

Due date: 2021-02-13 (13th)

  • Create a shortlist of top release themes/features.
  • Post a message on #release-post slack channel and ping @product-team @brianglanz for feedback on top features (give a list of 4-5 themes or 8-10 features).

Due date: 2021-02-15 (15th)

Due date: 2021-02-16 (16th)

  • Commit the first (rough) draft of the release post introduction with the various themes/features selected above in 2021-02-22-gitlab-13-9-released.html.md in the release X-Y branch. Notify the TW lead and release post manager, along with the PMs & PMMs who's features are listed in the intro for review.
  • Ping the Marketing Events & Field teams to see if there is an upcoming even to promote.
    • update data/release_posts/X_Y/cta.yml with any relevant CTA (Commit promotion, for example). Ensure that X_Y in the file path reflects the current release. If there isn't a specific call to action to add, use this as the default button text: "Join us for an upcoming event" with a link to '/events/'. Reference this example from 13.1 under data/release_posts/13_1/cta.yml if needed.

Due date: 2021-02-17 (17th)

  • Update the intro based on the feedback and polish it such that it is ready for the release post manager to ask for executive review no later than ~12pm PST. Notify the release post manager that you have completed revisions on the intro.

Due date: 2021-02-18 (18th)

On the 18th several tasks need to be performed after the release post manager has performed the content assembly.

  • Finalize your theme and intro content based on which features actually merged and can be mentioned in the release post.

    • Link the release post times mentioned in the intro to the item blocks within the release post. For example, for a feature named "Define test cases in GitLab", the link from the introduction should point to "#define-test-cases-in-gitlab"

  • Reorder primary features in the data/release_posts/XX_X folder according to their relevance per the theme of your release post intro. Order the post by changing the file names to alphanumeric names (e.g. 01_feature_name.yml, 02_feature_name.yml, etc)

    • Mark the 1st item in the post as top while the rest will be primary or secondary based on what the PM has decided.
    • If you think any features should change from primary to secondary add a suggestion to the release post item yml and ping the PM owner to review & apply it.

  • Add a sentence in the introductory paragraph to state how many new features (top, primary, and secondary) and performance improvements have been shipped. To get the number, you'll do a hand count of just features and performance improvements (do not include bugs, upgrades, etc.) and in /data/release_posts/X_Y on the current release-X-Y branch.

    • Add a video link to the kickoff call recording at the bottom of the release post introduction. You can find the video once it's available on the direction page.

  • on the release-x-y branch, update the release blurb for the homepage (check /sites/marketing/source/includes/home/ten-oh-announcement.html.haml). In the announcement file, update the description of the blog post with the relevant details for the current release including the current release number and dates as appropriate.

  • ensure that the social sharing text for the click to tweet button on the bottom of the release post is available in the introduction

  • Once all of your tasks above are complete:

    • Assign the MR back to the next reviewer (TW lead for Structural Check) and unassaign yourself.
    • Notify release post manager that you're done with the messaging lead tasks needed for final content review, by pinging them in the Slack X-Y release post prep channel.

Due date: 2021-02-20 (20th)

  • Did anything change between the 18th and 20th? (e.g. features slipped, additional changes based on final reivew, etc.) review all of the tasks due on the 18th to make sure that you update all the places the places that need to be updated.

Structural check (Technical Writing Lead)

Due date: 2021-02-18 (18th)

The structural check is performed by the technical writing lead: @rdickenson

For suggestions that you are confident don't need to be reviewed, change them locally and push a commit directly to save the PMs from unneeded reviews. For example:

  • clear typos, like this is a typpo
  • minor front matter issues, like single quotes instead of double quotes, or vice versa
  • extra whitespace

For any changes to the content itself, make suggestions directly on the release post diff, and be sure to ping the reporter for that block in the suggestion comment, so that they can find it easily.

  • Add the label review-structure.
  • Check frontmatter entries and syntax.
  • Check that the item's name doesn't contain the Markdown `code` formatting.
  • Check that images match the context in which they are used, and are clear.
  • Check all images (png, jpg, and gifs) are smaller than 150 KB each.
  • Check for duplicate entries.
  • Check that features introduced in this release do not mistakenly reference previous releases (this often happens after features slip to a future release after an RPI is already written). If, for example, the current release is 13.8, and an item reads: "In GitLab 13.7 we introduced XXX...", this means the feature most likely slipped to 13.8. In that case, correct the text to "In GitLab 13.8 we introduced XXX...". A search for two or three previous release numbers ("13.7", "13.6", and "13.5" in our example) in the review app should be enough to spot this.
  • Check all dates mentioned in entries, ensuring they refer to the correct year.
  • Remove any .gitkeep files accidentally included.
  • Add or check cover_img: license block (at the end of the post). Should include image_url:, license:, license_url:.
  • Check the anchor links in the intro. All links in the release post markdown file should point to something in the release post Yaml file.
  • Run a dead link checker, e.g., Check my Links and ping reporters directly on Slack asking them to fix broken links.
    • Links to confidential issues may be missed. It is helpful to check for broken links as an unauthenticated GitLab user (either logged out, in another browser, or in Incognito mode).
  • Run a spelling check against the Release Post's View app. For example, using Webpage Spell-Check for Google Chrome.
  • Report any problems from structural check in the #release-post channel by pinging the reporters directly for each problem. Do NOT ping @all or @channel nor leave a general message to which no one will pay attention. If possible, ensure open discussions in the merge request track any issues.
  • Post a comment in the #whats-happening-at-gitlab channel linking to the View App + merge request reminding the team to take a look at the release post and to report problems in #release-post. CC the release post manager and messaging lead. Template to use (replace links): 
    Hey all! This month's release post is almost ready! Take a look at it and either
report any problems in #release-post, or leave a comment to the release post MR.
MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/merge_requests/1234
View app: https://release-13-9.about.gitlab-review.app/releases/2021/02/22/gitlab-13-9-released/index.html
  • Remove the label review-structure.
  • Assign the MR to the next reviewer (release post manager)
  • Notify release post manager that you're done with the structural check needed for final content review, by pinging them in the Slack X-Y release post prep channel.
  • Within 1 week, update the release post templates and release post handbook with anything that comes up during the process.

Final content review (@awthomas)

Due date: 2021-02-19 (18th - 19th)

  • Check to be sure there are no broken links in the View app (use a dead link checker, e.g., Check my Links)
  • Mention @sytse, @sfwgitlab, and @adawar in #release-post on Slack when the post has been generated for their review per these communication guidelines
  • Capture any feedback from Slack into a single comment on the Release Post MR with action items assigned to the DRIs to address. More info here

Incorporating Feedback - Due date: 2021-02-20 (by the 20th)

  • Make sure all feedback from CEO and Product team reviews have been addressed by working with DRIs of those areas as needed
  • If you receive feedback about the ordering Primary Items work with the Messaging Lead to determine how you might adjust the order.
  • If applicable re-order Secondary items by adjusting the titles in the content blocks. More information to consider about altering secondary items here | technical instructions
  • Make sure there are no open feedback items in this MR or in Slack #release-post channel
  • On 20th, ping VP Product Management (@adawar) for final check in Slack #release-post
  • After VP Product Management review, remove the label review-in-progress

Preparing to merge to master (@awthomas)

On the 21st

  • Make sure the homepage card was updated by the Messaging lead on the release X-Y branch.
  • Check with the Messaging lead to confirm the social sharing copy is finalized (should be visible in View app at this point)
  • Lock features.yml on the master branch with File Locking on the 21st
  • Mention @community-team on Slack #swag to ask them to send the swag pack to the MVP
  • Check if all the anchor links in the intro are working
  • Confirm there are no broken links in the View app (use a dead link checker, e.g., Check my Links)
  • Check the total features and improvements count statement in the introductory paragraph to make sure the number stated is accurate, and if not, update it and inform the Messaging lead. To get the number, you'll do a hand count of just features and performance improvements (do not include bugs, upgrades, etc.) in /data/release_posts/X_Y on the current release-X-Y branch.
  • Check to make sure all unresolved threads on this MR are resolved and there are no merge conflicts. If you need help resolving merge conflicts ask for help in #dev-escalation in Slack
  • Reach out to the [release managers (https://about.gitlab.com/community/release-managers/) the day before the release to let them know you are running the release and ask them to keep you in the loop on the release.

On the 22nd (@awthomas)

At 12:30 UTC

  • Read the important notes below
  • Say hello in #releases slack channel to let the release managers you're online and await their que in #release-post to start the merge process of the release post.
    • Release Managers will alert you in #release-post if there are any issues with the release. You can follow along on the release issue to see the packaging progress on the 22nd | issue list example issue. The #releases slack channel is also a good place to track any updates or announcements.
    • If anything is wrong with the release, or if it's delayed, you must ping the messaging lead on #release-post so that they coordinate anything scheduled on their side (e.g., press releases, other posts, etc).
    • If everything is okay, the packages should be published at 13:30 UTC, and available publicly around 14:10 UTC.
  • Check to make sure there aren't any alerts on Slack #release-post and #whats-happening-at-gitlab channels
  • Check to make sure there aren't any alerts on this MR or merge conflicts

Merging to master (@awthomas)

At 13:50 UTC

Once the release manager confirmed that the packages are publicly available by pinging you in Slack:

  • Unlock features.yml just before merging.
  • Announce to the team in #release-post that you are starting the final merge process and will reach out for help if the MR fails and that you will lead collaboration with the appropriate team members to resolve problems
  • Merge the MR at 14:10-14:20 UTC.
  • Wait for the pipeline. This can take anywhere from 20-45 minutes to complete.
  • Check the live URL on social media (after MR is merged) with Twitter Card Validator and Facebook Debugger. You may get a warning from Facebook that says "Missing Properties - The following required properties are missing: fb:app_id" - this can be ignored.
  • Check for broken links again once the post is live.
  • Handoff social posts to the social team and confirm that it's ready to publish: Mention @social in the #release-post Slack channel; be sure to include the live URL link and social media copy (you can copy/paste the final copy from the View app).
    • A member of the social team will schedule the posts at the next available best time on the same day. The social team will mark the Slack message with a ⏳ once scheduled and add scheduled times to the post thread for team awareness. Further details are listed below in the Important Notes Section.
  • Share the links to the post on the #release-posts and #whats-happening-at-gitlab channels on Slack.
  • IMPORTANT Unlock the unreleased directory to stop preventing more release posts from merging there.

What to do if your pipeline fails or you have other technical problems

For assistance related to failed pipelines or eleventh-hour issues merging the release post, follow the Dev on-call process by asking for assistance in the #dev-escalation Slack channel. Cross post the thread from #dev-escalation in #release-post so all Product Managers and release post stakeholders are aware of status and delays.

Important notes

  • The post is to be live on the 22nd at 15:00 UTC. It should be merged and as soon as GitLab.com is up and running on the new release version (or the latest RC that has the same features as the release), and once all packages are publicly available. Not before. Ideally, merge it around 14:20 UTC as the pipeline takes about 40 min to run.
  • The usual release time is 15:00 UTC but it varies according to the deployment. If something comes up and delays the release, the release post will be delayed with the release.
  • Coordinate the timing with the release managers. Ask them to keep you in the loop. Ideally, the packages should be published around 13:30-13:40, so they will be publicly available around 14:10 and you'll be able to merge the post at 14:20ish.
  • Once the release post is live, wait a few minutes to see if no one spots an error (usually posted in #whats-happening-at-gitlab or #company-fyi), then follow the handoff to social team checklist item above.
  • The tweet to share on Slack will not be live, it will be scheduled during a peak awareness time on the 22nd. Once the tweet is live, the social team will share the tweet link in the #release-post and in the #whats-happening-at-gitlab Slack channels.
  • Keep an eye on Slack and in the blog post comments for a few hours to make sure no one found anything that needs fixing.
Edited by Christen Dybenko

Merge request reports