Add a note about Psych parsing
What does this MR do?
A user (internal link) was confused by the behaviour of their pipeline variables after specifying:
variables:
ACCOUNT_ID1: 011111111111
ACCOUNT_ID2: 022222222222
ACCOUNT_ID3: 033333333333
ACCOUNT_ID4: 044444444444
ACCOUNT_ID5: 055555555555
ACCOUNT_ID6: 066666666666
ACCOUNT_ID7: 077777777777
ACCOUNT_ID8: 088888888888
Resulting in:
$ echo $ACCOUNT_ID1
1227133513
$ echo $ACCOUNT_ID2
2454267026
$ echo $ACCOUNT_ID3
3681400539
$ echo $ACCOUNT_ID4
4908534052
$ echo $ACCOUNT_ID5
6135667565
$ echo $ACCOUNT_ID6
7362801078
$ echo $ACCOUNT_ID7
8589934591
$ echo $ACCOUNT_ID8
088888888888
I couldn't find anywhere in our documentation that documents this behaviour, hence adding the hint to https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/variables/.
I wasn't sure if it should be a warning or otherwise, I'm open to suggestions/improvements or pointers to where it may already be documented.
Author's checklist
-
Optional. Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course. -
Follow the: -
If you're adding or changing the main heading of the page (H1), ensure that the product tier badge is added. -
If you are a GitLab team member, request a review based on: - The documentation page's metadata.
- The associated Technical Writer.
If you are a GitLab team member and only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:
~"frontend"
~"backend"
~"type::bug"
~"database"
These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.
Reviewer's checklist
Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.
If you aren't sure which tech writer to ask, use roulette or ask in the #docs Slack channel.
-
If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert. - Technical writer review items:
-
Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date. -
Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR. -
Ensure a release milestone is set. - If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
-
The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior
, say something likeDefault behavior when you close an issue
. -
The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK
, say something likeConfigure GDK
. -
Any task steps should be written as a numbered list. - If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
-
-
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the reviews above. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review.