Move CODEOWNERS syntax reference to a child page
What does this MR do?
I needed to merge the large reference-style contributions from @jwoodwardgl rather quickly as part of the two related issues listed below, to keep him moving on his milestone goals. I knew the docs cleanup would be gnarly, and he didn't need to be involved in it.
The addition of large syntax and error-handling portions to an already-overloaded CODEOWNERS page just wasn't going to work long-term. They needed to be in a child page (pages?) of doc/user/project/code_owners.md
, but I needed a new subdirectory to build a place for it. !117061 (merged) moved the file from doc/user/project/code_owners.md
to doc/user/project/codeowners/index.md
, so this work would have a home.
Now the disclaimer for the docs reviewer: doc/user/project/codeowners/index.md
) is still a hot mess. It's been a hybrid of user docs and syntax documentation for longer than I've been part of Create, and this MR doesn't finish the work. You'll find syntax-related instructions all over the page, still. My goal with this merge request is to find a manageable MVC that I can land before the 16th, so the page and its nav entry will appear in the %15.11 release. After this merge request, I can start spinning up parallel (smaller!) merge requests to start work on cleaning up individual subheadings.
Related issues
- Related to Technical design doc for Code Owners (#219916 - closed)
- Related to Add code owner documentation details to explain... (#396315 - closed)
Author's checklist
-
Optional. Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course. -
Follow the: -
If you're adding or changing the main heading of the page (H1), ensure that the product tier badge is added. -
If you are a GitLab team member, request a review based on: - The documentation page's metadata.
- The associated Technical Writer.
If you are a GitLab team member and only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:
~"frontend"
~"backend"
~"type::bug"
~"database"
These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.
Reviewer's checklist
Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.
If you aren't sure which tech writer to ask, use roulette or ask in the #docs Slack channel.
-
If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert. - Technical writer review items:
-
Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date. -
Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR. -
Ensure a release milestone is set. - If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
-
The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior
, say something likeDefault behavior when you close an issue
. -
The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK
, say something likeConfigure GDK
. -
Any task steps should be written as a numbered list. - If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
-
-
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the reviews above. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review.