Add documentation for obsolete migrations
What does this MR do?
Obsolete migrations can never run or be retried, as their migration code is removed. I thought it would be beneficial to explicitly mention this in the docs, to allow customers and GitLab team members to better understand this process and the circumstances where migrations can't be run.
We've seen a number of tickets where customers have had to re-index from scratch due to having pending migrations that have been removed/made obsolete. Documenting this may improve support interactions, or remove the need for support involvement altogether.
- https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/414718
- https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/392275
- https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/277339
- https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/385840
- https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/390109
- https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/409137
- https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/408093
This is documenting what has already been added to the Elastic::MigrationObsolete
module:
Related issues
Author's checklist
-
Optional. Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course. -
Follow the: -
If you're adding or changing the main heading of the page (H1), ensure that the product tier badge is added. -
If you are a GitLab team member, request a review based on: - The documentation page's metadata.
- The associated Technical Writer.
If you are a GitLab team member and only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:
~"frontend"
~"backend"
~"type::bug"
~"database"
These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.
Reviewer's checklist
Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.
If you aren't sure which tech writer to ask, use roulette or ask in the #docs Slack channel.
-
If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert. - Technical writer review items:
-
Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date. -
Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR. -
Ensure a release milestone is set. - If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
-
The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior
, say something likeDefault behavior when you close an issue
. -
The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK
, say something likeConfigure GDK
. -
Any task steps should be written as a numbered list. - If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
-
-
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the reviews above. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review.