Dependency proxy for packages documentation
🔭 Context
We're working on the very first version of the dependency proxy for packages. See #407460 (comment 1373731852) for all the details from the technical investigation.
At the core, the concept is right simple. GitLab will act with as a proxy. Basically, users can pull packages through it and GitLab will be a pull-through cache.
Package Manager clients (npm, maven, ...) <-> GitLab <-> External Package Registry
This feature already exists for container images: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/packages/dependency_proxy/. The above is the exact same thing but for packages.
🤔 What does this MR do?
- Introduce the documentation for the dependency proxy for packages. For now, the only package format that is supported is Maven.
The proxy is still behind a feature flag : #415218 (closed).
Related issues
Epic: &3610 (closed)
Issue: #410731 (closed)
Author's checklist
-
Optional. Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course. -
Follow the: -
If you're adding or changing the main heading of the page (H1), ensure that the product tier badge is added. -
If you are a GitLab team member, request a review based on: - The documentation page's metadata.
- The associated Technical Writer.
If you are a GitLab team member and only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:
~"frontend"
~"backend"
~"type::bug"
~"database"
These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.
🛃 Reviewer's checklist
Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.
If you aren't sure which tech writer to ask, use roulette or ask in the #docs Slack channel.
-
If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert. - Technical writer review items:
-
Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date. -
Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR. -
Ensure a release milestone is set. - If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
-
The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior
, say something likeDefault behavior when you close an issue
. -
The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK
, say something likeConfigure GDK
. -
Any task steps should be written as a numbered list. - If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
-
-
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the reviews above. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review.