Fetching all projects of group and applying conditions in audit events
What does this MR do and why?
Currently we are fetching the list of all non deleted projects of group in audit events controller by using group.all_projects_except_soft_deleted
, which is triggering an inefficient query(check query plan section) and leading to statement timeouts. The main reason for inefficiency is that there is a where clause on 2 non-indexed fields marked_for_deletion_at
and pending_delete
.
So to fix this problem, we will be fetching all projects of the group by running group.all_projects
and then iterate on them and do not include those projects which are pending for deletion or marked for deletion by checking in ruby code. You can observe the performance improvement in the query plan. Proper fix would be deployed as part of #438351 (closed).
Query plan
Old
Joe bot got stuck for groups with huge no. of projects.
SELECT
"projects"."id"
FROM
"projects"
WHERE
"projects"."namespace_id" IN (
SELECT
namespaces.traversal_ids[array_length(namespaces.traversal_ids, 1) ] AS id
FROM
"namespaces"
WHERE
"namespaces"."type" = 'Group'
AND (
traversal_ids @ > ('{2769844}')
)
)
AND "projects"."marked_for_deletion_at" IS NULL
AND "projects"."pending_delete" = FALSE
ORDER BY
"projects"."id" ASC
LIMIT
1;
New
https://postgres.ai/console/gitlab/gitlab-production-tunnel-pg12/sessions/25401/commands/80566
SELECT
"projects"."id"
FROM
"projects"
WHERE
"projects"."namespace_id" IN (
SELECT
namespaces.traversal_ids[array_length(namespaces.traversal_ids, 1) ] AS id
FROM
"namespaces"
WHERE
"namespaces"."type" = 'Group'
AND (
traversal_ids @ > ('{2769844}')
)
)
ORDER BY
"projects"."id" ASC
LIMIT
1;
MR acceptance checklist
Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
Before | After |
---|---|
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
Related to #437282 (closed)