Resolve "Move EE-specific images to `ee/app/assets/images` directory"
What does this MR do?
› git diff ce/master..origin/master --name-status ./app/assets/images | grep -e '^A' | cut -f2 | xargs -t -L1 -I % dirname % | xargs -t -L1 -I % mkdir -p ee/%
dirname app/assets/images/authbuttons/kerberos_32.png
mkdir -p ee/app/assets/images/authbuttons
dirname app/assets/images/authbuttons/kerberos_64.png
dirname app/assets/images/favicon-green.ico
mkdir -p ee/app/assets/images/authbuttons
dirname app/assets/images/gitlab_for_slack.gif
mkdir -p ee/app/assets/images
mkdir -p ee/app/assets/images
dirname app/assets/images/illustrations/gitlab_geo.svg
dirname app/assets/images/mailers/approval/icon-merge-request-gray.gif
mkdir -p ee/app/assets/images/illustrations
dirname app/assets/images/mailers/approval/icon-x-orange-inverted.gif
mkdir -p ee/app/assets/images/mailers/approval
mkdir -p ee/app/assets/images/mailers/approval
and then
› git diff ce/master..origin/master --name-status ./app/assets/images | grep -e '^A' | cut -f2 | xargs -t -L1 -I % git mv % ee/%
mv app/assets/images/authbuttons/kerberos_32.png ee/app/assets/images/authbuttons/kerberos_32.png
mv app/assets/images/authbuttons/kerberos_64.png ee/app/assets/images/authbuttons/kerberos_64.png
mv app/assets/images/favicon-green.ico ee/app/assets/images/favicon-green.ico
mv app/assets/images/gitlab_for_slack.gif ee/app/assets/images/gitlab_for_slack.gif
mv app/assets/images/illustrations/gitlab_geo.svg ee/app/assets/images/illustrations/gitlab_geo.svg
mv app/assets/images/mailers/approval/icon-merge-request-gray.gif ee/app/assets/images/mailers/approval/icon-merge-request-gray.gif
mv app/assets/images/mailers/approval/icon-x-orange-inverted.gif ee/app/assets/images/mailers/approval/icon-x-orange-inverted.gif
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- Review
-
Has been reviewed by Backend
-
-
Conform by the merge request performance guides -
Conform by the style guides -
Squashed related commits together -
Internationalization required/considered -
If paid feature, have we considered GitLab.com plan and how it works for groups and is there a design for promoting it to users who aren't on the correct plan
What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #4630 (closed)
Edited by Rémy Coutable