Update variables to disable autodevops jobs
What does this MR do?
Customer raised ticket (internal links) asking how to disable jobs in the autodevops Test
stage.
Stood up a test ruby project, and the off-variables for some of the jobs are not documented. Added them.
- Added in the secrets jobs
Job names have changed as well.
- MR for license_scanning rename sourcing 12.8
- Could not easily establish how long it's been
code_quality
and notcodequality
. - Could not easily establish how long it's been
container_scanning
and notsast:container
.
I've kept the job names that are already documented [a] because I cannot be certain that there isn't a job with that name, somewhere, and [b] so the docs work for folks on older versions.
There's a bunch more of jobs in our code base, but I don't know if they get picked up by autodevops.
It might be useful to link into our code base so folk can find the variables? Thoughts?
Related issues
Author's checklist (required)
-
Follow the Documentation Guidelines and Style Guide. - If you have Developer permissions or higher:
-
Ensure that the product tier badge is added to doc's h1
. -
Apply the documentation label, plus: - The corresponding DevOps stage and group labels, if applicable.
-
development guidelines when changing docs under
doc/development/*
,CONTRIBUTING.md
, orREADME.md
. -
development guidelines and Documentation guidelines when changing docs under
development/documentation/*
. - development guidelines and Description templates (.gitlab/*) when creating/updating issue and MR description templates.
-
Assign the designated Technical Writer.
-
Do not add the feature, frontend, backend, ~"bug", or database labels if you are only updating documentation. These labels will cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.
When applicable:
-
Update the permissions table. -
Link docs to and from the higher-level index page, plus other related docs where helpful. -
Add the product tier badge accordingly. -
Add GitLab's version history note(s). -
Add/update the feature flag section.
Review checklist
All reviewers can help ensure accuracy, clarity, completeness, and adherence to the Documentation Guidelines and Style Guide.
1. Primary Reviewer
-
Review by a code reviewer or other selected colleague to confirm accuracy, clarity, and completeness. This can be skipped for minor fixes without substantive content changes.
2. Technical Writer
-
Technical writer review. If not requested for this MR, must be scheduled post-merge. To request for this MR, assign the writer listed for the applicable DevOps stage. -
Ensure docs metadata are present and up-to-date. -
Ensure Technical Writing and documentation are added. -
Add the corresponding docs::
scoped label. -
Add twdoing when starting work on the MR. -
Add twfinished if Technical Writing team work on the MR is complete but it remains open.
-
3. Maintainer
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the above reviews. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review. -
Ensure a release milestone is set. -
If there has not been a technical writer review, create an issue for one using the Doc Review template.