Fix flaky epics_finder_spec race condition
What does this MR do?
As per #321511 (closed) we've seen
one of these tests fail. It seems likely the problem is caused by the
use of X.days.ago
throughout and then filtering with date ranges. The
likely explanation is that when the test is running just before midnight
then 2.days.ago
actually ends up being "3 days ago" from a date
perspective by the time the assertion is made about it.
Even though it's not easy to replicate this exact failure mode and this flakiness has never happened for this spec before (to my knowledge) in 3 years it still is not a good way to write these kinds of tests as this is theoretically a problem.
Instead of making all the times relative to "now" (which changes) I've just made everything relative to some arbitrary fixed time. This works fine, without any need for freezing time, as none of the methods being tested actually refer to the current time.
The test is still quite difficult to read due to many different dates and times and the fact that the examples are separated from the test setup but I don't think this change makes it less clear.
Screenshots (strongly suggested)
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
Conformity
- [-] Changelog entry
- [-] Documentation (if required)
-
Code review guidelines -
Merge request performance guidelines -
Style guides -
Database guides -
Separation of EE specific content
Availability and Testing
-
Review and add/update tests for this feature/bug. Consider all test levels. See the Test Planning Process. -
Tested in all supported browsers -
Informed Infrastructure department of a default or new setting change, if applicable per definition of done
Security
If this MR contains changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods and other items described in the security review guidelines:
-
Label as security and @ mention @gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec
-
The MR includes necessary changes to maintain consistency between UI, API, email, or other methods -
Security reports checked/validated by a reviewer from the AppSec team
Related to #321511 (closed)