Add support to suggest metrics names

What does this MR do?

• Refactor the existing name suggestions generator in a factory
• This can be used now for both case usage_data.rb and in instrumentation classes
• Add support in instrumentation classes for the metric name suggestions.
• This name will be later used when generate metric definitions with instrumentation classes

Usage/Test

> Gitlab::Usage::Metrics::Instrumentations::CountIssuesMetric.new(time_frame: '28d').suggested_name
=> "count_issues"
[6] pry(main)> Gitlab::Usage::Metrics::Instrumentations::CountUsersCreatingIssuesMetric.new(time_frame: '28d').suggested_name
=> "count_distinct_author_id_from_issues"
 Gitlab::Usage::Metrics::Instrumentations::RedisHLLMetric.new(time_frame: '28d', options: {events: 'i_quickactions_approve'}).suggested_name
=> "<please fill metric name, suggested format is: {subject}_{verb}{ing|ed}_{object} eg: users_creating_epics or merge_requests_viewed_in_single_file_mode>"
 Gitlab::Usage::Metrics::Instrumentations::UuidMetric.new(time_frame: 'none').suggested_name
=> "<please fill metric name>"

Screenshots (strongly suggested)

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

Conformity

• I have included a changelog entry, or it's not needed. (Does this MR need a changelog?)
• I have added/updated documentation, or it's not needed. (Is documentation required?)
• I have properly separated EE content from FOSS, or this MR is FOSS only. (Where should EE code go?)
• I have added information for database reviewers in the MR description, or it's not needed. (Does this MR have database related changes?)
• I have self-reviewed this MR per code review guidelines.
• This MR does not harm performance, or I have asked a reviewer to help assess the performance impact. (Merge request performance guidelines)
• I have followed the style guides.

Availability and Testing

• I have added/updated tests following the Testing Guide, or it's not needed. (Consider all test levels. See the Test Planning Process.)
• I have tested this MR in all supported browsers, or it's not needed.
• I have informed the Infrastructure department of a default or new setting change per definition of done, or it's not needed.

Security

Does this MR contain changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods or other items described in the security review guidelines? If not, then delete this Security section.

• Label as security and @ mention @gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec
• The MR includes necessary changes to maintain consistency between UI, API, email, or other methods
• Security reports checked/validated by a reviewer from the AppSec team

Related to #331133 (closed)