Prevent creation of too long file name
What does this MR do?
This MR prevents a "File name too long" from being created, which is problematic because it can break backups > Issue: #254215 (closed). This happens when pasting some long texts from Microsoft into our dropzone text area.
Before |
This MR |
---|---|
Sucessfully create an image with the long file name |
Yay, file name automatically truncates to acceptable length before sending it to our upload request |
Notes
Yes, on the frontend we have addressed the problem of sending a long file name to our upload request. But I think on the backend we might want to add some additional checks to NOT accept too long file names from being saved in the first place (it should not be a successful response, it should fail). Here's a follow-up ticket to address that > #339982
Secondly, we might want to look into why texts from Microsoft products (ie. OneNote and Powerpoint) get pasted as images instead of actual text. Here's the follow up to look into that > #339984 (closed)
Testing Case
- Find a random MR where you can insert a comment.
- Paste a very long text into a Microsoft OneNote. Below is a sample text you can use (it contains 320 characters).
lorem_ipsum_dolor_sit_amet_consectetuer_adipiscing_elit_aenean_commodo_ligula_eget_dolor_aenean_massa_cum_sociis_natoque_penatibus_et_magnis_dis_parturient_montes_nascetur_ridiculus_mus_donec_quam_felis_ultricies_nec_pellentesque_eu_pretium_quis_sem_nulla_consequat_massa_quis_enim_donec_pede_justo_fringilla_vel_ali_320
- Copy the text from Microsoft OneNote into your comment textarea.
- The pasted text (which will become an image) will be uploaded and saved with a truncated text name.
Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
Conformity
-
I have included changelog trailers, or none are needed. (Does this MR need a changelog?) -
I have added/updated documentation, or it's not needed. (Is documentation required?) -
I have properly separated EE content from FOSS, or this MR is FOSS only. (Where should EE code go?) -
I have added information for database reviewers in the MR description, or it's not needed. (Does this MR have database related changes?) -
I have self-reviewed this MR per code review guidelines. -
This MR does not harm performance, or I have asked a reviewer to help assess the performance impact. (Merge request performance guidelines) -
I have followed the style guides. -
This change is backwards compatible across updates, or this does not apply.
Availability and Testing
-
I have added/updated tests following the Testing Guide, or it's not needed. (Consider all test levels. See the Test Planning Process.) -
I have tested this MR in all supported browsers, or it's not needed. -
I have informed the Infrastructure department of a default or new setting change per definition of done, or it's not needed.
Security
Does this MR contain changes to processing or storing of credentials or tokens, authorization and authentication methods or other items described in the security review guidelines? If not, then delete this Security section.
-
Label as security and @ mention @gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec
-
The MR includes necessary changes to maintain consistency between UI, API, email, or other methods -
Security reports checked/validated by a reviewer from the AppSec team
Related to #254215 (closed)