Fix a broken .include?(Regexp) call
What does this MR do and why?
This fixes a silly .include?(Regexp)
call introduced in !64284 (diffs).
I've also added a .to_s
call to the environment variable in case it's nil
(e.g. in master
pipelines).
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Related to #345153 (closed).
Edited by Rémy Coutable