Revise UI messages for invalid merge requests
What does this MR do?
Intends to revise the messages in app/views/projects/merge_requests/invalid.html.haml
when merge requests just can't load, due to edge cases like:
- Fork is gone.
- Target branch is gone.
- Source branch is gone.
$some_other_failure
The HAML is a mishmash of variables and text, and I can't figure out how to edit it locally + get the changes to pass haml-lint
. I expect I'll need to provide the messages here in a comment, and then ask some sweetheart of a frontend engineer to reverse-engineer the text back into the HAML file, because this one's beyond me.
Proposed new message stem + endings
Can't show this merge request because
- the fork project was removed. (TBD: next step?)
- the source branch
$x
is missing from project$y
. Close this merge request or update the source branch. - the target branch
$x
is missing from project$y
. Close this merge request or update the target branch. - of an internal error. (TBD: next step?)
Related issues
- Related to &6436 where we're polishing all UI messages related to merge requests.
- Related to #346053 (closed) because it's gonna land in 14.6!
Author's checklist
-
Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course -
Follow the: -
Ensure that the product tier badge is added to topic's h1
. -
Request a review based on: - The documentation page's metadata.
- The associated Technical Writer.
If you are only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:
~"type::feature"
~"frontend"
~"backend"
~"type::bug"
~"database"
These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.
Review checklist
Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.
-
If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert. - Technical writer review items:
-
Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date. -
Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR. - If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
-
The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior
, say something likeDefault behavior when you close an issue
. -
The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK
, say something likeConfigure GDK
. -
Any task steps should be written as a numbered list. - If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
-
-
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the above reviews. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review. -
Ensure a release milestone is set.