Instructions to run pending background migrations
What does this MR do?
This change adds commands to re-run all migrations found marked as pending and remaining stuck in such a state
It expands on an existing area of troubleshooting background migrations while specifically targeting the pending state situation instead of migration jobs that are scheduled but remain un-executed.
It also adds an upgrade note to version 13.6 section where a background migration was introduced with a bug in it that can cause it to show up as pending in all releases after it. This was only recently noticed after we introduced new commands that check for pending background migration jobs as part of checking background migrations prior to upgrades.
A fix for the 13.6 bug should be included in GitLab 14.9 onwards via !81879 (merged) and following the added instructions should help clear the migration.
Related issues
Several customer tickets, see growing list in ZenDesk search (internal): https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/search/1?type=ticket&q=%22Gitlab%3A%3ADatabase%3A%3ABackgroundMigrationJob.pending.count%22
Author's checklist
-
Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course. -
Follow the: -
Ensure that the product tier badge is added to topic's h1
. -
Request a review based on: - The documentation page's metadata.
- The associated Technical Writer.
If you are only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:
~"frontend"
~"backend"
~"type::bug"
~"database"
These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.
Review checklist
Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.
-
If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert. - Technical writer review items:
-
Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date. -
Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR. - If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
-
The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior
, say something likeDefault behavior when you close an issue
. -
The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK
, say something likeConfigure GDK
. -
Any task steps should be written as a numbered list. - If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
-
-
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the reviews above. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review. -
Ensure a release milestone is set.